Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information Leadership, Fifth Edition

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Work and Occupations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by NEAR, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by JENSEN, T. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Whistleblowing Process

Retaliation and Perceived Effectiveness

JANET P. NEAR

Indiana University

TAMILA C. JENSEN

Boren, Elperin, Howard, and Sloan Attorneys at Law

Little empirical work has been completed on the whistleblowing process in organizations. This study examines questionnaire data from 72 respondents who blew the whistle on their employers with regard to alleged sex discrimination. Results indicate that whistleblowers considered the process to be more effective when their cases were determined to have merit and when they felt they had succeeded in changing management's attitudes. Retaliation by employer had little influence on whether the whistleblower considered the process to be effective. Further, retaliation was less likely to occur when the whistleblower's case was determined to have merit.

Work and Occupations, Vol. 10, No. 1, 3-28 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/0730888483010001001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
J. W. Kassing
Breaking the Chain of Command: Making Sense of Employee Circumvention
Journal of Business Communication, July 1, 2009; 46(3): 311 - 334.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Review of Public Personnel AdministrationHome page
J. P. Near and M. P. Miceli
Wrongdoing, Whistle-Blowing, and Retaliation in the U.S. Government: What Have Researchers Learned From the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) Survey Results?
Review of Public Personnel Administration, September 1, 2008; 28(3): 263 - 281.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Management InquiryHome page
M. P. Miceli
Whistle-Blowing Research and The Insider: Lessons Learned and Yet to Be Learned
Journal of Management Inquiry, December 1, 2004; 13(4): 364 - 366.
[PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
J.-Y. Lee, S. G. Heilmann, and J. P. Near
Blowing the Whistle on Sexual Harassment: Test of a Model of Predictors and Outcomes
Human Relations, March 1, 2004; 57(3): 297 - 322.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
C. R. Kaiser and C. T. Miller
Derogating the Victim: The Interpersonal Consequences of Blaming Events on Discrimination
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, July 1, 2003; 6(3): 227 - 237.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
J. W. Kassing and T. A. Armstrong
Someone's Going to Hear about This: Examining the Association between Dissent-Triggering Events and Employees' Dissent Expression
Management Communication Quarterly, August 1, 2002; 16(1): 39 - 65.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
M. P. Miceli and J. P. Near
What Makes Whistle-Blowers Effective? Three Field Studies
Human Relations, April 1, 2002; 55(4): 455 - 479.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
J. W. Kassing
From the Looks of Things: Assessing Perceptions of Organizational Dissenters
Management Communication Quarterly, February 1, 2001; 14(3): 442 - 470.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
J. W. Kassing and T. A. Avtgis
Examining the Relationship between Organizational Dissent and Aggressive Communication
Management Communication Quarterly, August 1, 1999; 13(1): 100 - 115.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
S. Ellis and S. Arieli
Predicting Intentions to Report Administrative and Disciplinary Infractions: Applying the Reasoned Action Model
Human Relations, July 1, 1999; 52(7): 947 - 967.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
J. W. Kassing
Development and Validation of the Organizational Dissent Scale
Management Communication Quarterly, November 1, 1998; 12(2): 183 - 229.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
J. P. Near and M. P. Miceli
Whistle-Blowing: Myth and Reality
Journal of Management, June 1, 1996; 22(3): 507 - 526.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
J. P. Near, M. S. Baucus, and M. P. Miceli
The Relationship between Values and Practice: Organizational Climates for Wrongdoing
Administration Society, August 1, 1993; 25(2): 204 - 226.
[Abstract]