Work and Occupations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WOOD, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Work and Occupations, Vol. 16, No. 4, 446-460 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/0730888489016004004

The Japanese Management Model

Tacit Skills in Shop Floor Participation

STEPHEN WOOD

London School of Economics

A distinctive element of the Japanese management model is the greater role given to workers' knowledge. For some, this may simply be a further example of the expropriation by management of workers' skills and hence the perfection of Taylorism. For others it may indicate yet again the continual failure of Taylorism. In this perspective the Japanese management would simply be making explicit what is going on anyway, that is, the exercising of tacit skills. Can the involvement of workers in job design under the Japanese model then be treated as one of its distinguishing features? It is suggested in this article that Japanese workers' participation is distinctive insofar as it explicitly involves them in industrial engineering. The precise meaning and distinctiveness of this involvement derives from the wider innovations in production management, such as just-in-time (Kanban) and the continuous learning program (Kaizen), as well as other aspects of Japanese personnel practice. Such innovations have reversed certain features of conventional production management, but not the central tenets of mass production. The abolition of buffer stocks, centralized quality control, and the sovereignty of the industrial engineer have all been questioned within Japanese concepts. The article concludes by drawing out the implications of their development for a number of areas of theoretical concern, including conceptions of tacit skills, flexible specialization, and autonomy.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?