Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information Leadership, Fifth Edition

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Work and Occupations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MUELLER, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by PRICE, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Employee Commitment

Resolving some Issues

CHARLES W. MUELLER

University of Iowa

JEAN E. WALLACE

University of Iowa

JAMES L. PRICE

University of Iowa

There has been a recent upsurge of interest among sociologists in the organizational commitment of employees, with loyalty and intent to stay identified as distinct forms that this commitment can take. This article argues that progress in understanding organizational commitment will not be made until conceptual and empirical distinctions among various forms of employee commitment are recognized and demonstrated. With this as the objective, it was hypothesized that loyalty and intent to stay are conceptually and empirically distinct from each other as well as from two other forms of employee commitment: work commitment and career commitment. This was tested with confirmatory factor analysis and was supported across a variety of tests. Construct validation was obtained by supporting the hypothesis that the two forms of organizational commitment but not work or career commitment are less stable during the initial employment period but then stabilize with tenure. Finally, predictive validity was established for intent to stay by demonstrating that it predicted quit behavior, or turnover, but loyalty, work commitment, and career commitment did not. Implications for studying organizational commitment within the context of substantive sociological issues are discussed.

Work and Occupations, Vol. 19, No. 3, 211-236 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/0730888492019003001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Social WorkHome page
E. D. Giffords
An Examination of Organizational Commitment and Professional Commitment and the Relationship to Work Environment, Demographic and Organizational Factors
Journal of Social Work, October 1, 2009; 9(4): 386 - 404.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
I. Sieben
Does training trigger turnover - or not?: The impact of formal training on graduates' job search behaviour
Work Employment Society, September 1, 2007; 21(3): 397 - 416.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Asia Pacific Journal of Human ResourcesHome page
G. R. Brooks and J. P. Wallace
A discursive examination of the nature, determinants and impact of organisational commitment
Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, August 1, 2006; 44(2): 222 - 239.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
G. Wilson
Race and Job Dismissal: African American/White Differences in Their Sources During the Early Work Career
American Behavioral Scientist, May 1, 2005; 48(9): 1182 - 1199.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Economic and Industrial DemocracyHome page
S. C. McKay
Securing Commitment in an Insecure World: Workers in Multinational High-Tech Subsidiaries
Economic and Industrial Democracy, August 1, 2004; 25(3): 375 - 410.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work and OccupationsHome page
D. B. McBrier and G. Wilson
Going Down?: Race and Downward Occupational Mobility for White-Collar Workers in the 1990s
Work and Occupations, August 1, 2004; 31(3): 283 - 322.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Review of Public Personnel AdministrationHome page
R. W. Perry
The Relationship of Affective Organizational Commitment with Supervisory Trust
Review of Public Personnel Administration, June 1, 2004; 24(2): 133 - 149.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Comparative SociologyHome page
C. Hult
Organizational Commitment and Conflicting Values: The Impact of Systems of Norms in Six Western Countries
International Journal of Comparative Sociology, October 1, 2003; 44(5): 408 - 443.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Management EducationHome page
J. W. Westerman, M. D. Nowicki, and D. Plante
Fit in the Classroom: Predictors of Student Performance and Satisfaction in Management Education
Journal of Management Education, February 1, 2002; 26(1): 5 - 18.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work and OccupationsHome page
C. W. MUELLER, S. DE COSTER, and S. B. ESTES
Sexual Harassment in the Workplace: Unanticipated Consequences of Modern Social Control in Organizations
Work and Occupations, November 1, 2001; 28(4): 411 - 446.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
M. M. Mulinge
Employer Control of Employees: Extending the Lincoln-Kalleberg Corporatist Model of Satisfaction and Attachment
Human Relations, March 1, 2001; 54(3): 285 - 318.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work and OccupationsHome page
E. M. McDUFF and C. W. MUELLER
The Ministry as an Occupational Labor Market: Intentions to Leave an Employer (Church) Versus Intentions to Leave a Profession (Ministry)
Work and Occupations, February 1, 2000; 27(1): 89 - 116.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
J.-E. Johanson
Intraorganizational Influence: Theoretical Clarification and Empirical Assessment of Intraorganizational Social Influence
Management Communication Quarterly, February 1, 2000; 13(3): 393 - 425.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Review of Public Personnel AdministrationHome page
R. C. Nyhan
Increasing Affective Organizational Commitment in Public Organizations: The Key Role of Interpersonal Trust
Review of Public Personnel Administration, July 1, 1999; 19(3): 58 - 70.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work and OccupationsHome page
C. W. MUELLER, A. FINLEY, R. D. IVERSON, and J. L. PRICE
The Effects of Group Racial Composition on Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment, and Career Commitment: The Case of Teachers
Work and Occupations, May 1, 1999; 26(2): 187 - 219.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Asia Pacific Journal of Human ResourcesHome page
L. Ryan and K. A. Macky
Downsizing Organizations: Uses, Outcomes and Strategies
Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, December 1, 1998; 36(2): 29 - 45.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
J. E. Wallace
Becker's Side-Bet Theory of Commitment Revisited: Is It Time for a Moratorium or a Resurrection?
Human Relations, June 1, 1997; 50(6): 727 - 749.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work and OccupationsHome page
C. W. MUELLER, E. M. BOYER, J. L. PRICE, and R. D. IVERSON
Employee Attachment and Noncoercive Conditions of Work: The Case of Dental Hygienists
Work and Occupations, May 1, 1994; 21(2): 179 - 212.
[Abstract]


Home page
Acta SociologicaHome page
A. L. Kalleberg and A. Mastekaasa
Firm Internal Labor Markets and Organizational Commitment in Norway and the United States
Acta Sociologica, January 1, 1994; 37(3): 269 - 286.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work and OccupationsHome page
P. V. MARSDEN, A. L. KALLEBERG, and C. R. COOK
Gender Differences in Organizational Commitment: Influences of Work Positions and Family Roles
Work and Occupations, August 1, 1993; 20(3): 368 - 390.
[Abstract]