Work and Occupations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ESTES, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by GLASS, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Work and Occupations, Vol. 23, No. 4, 405-436 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0730888496023004005

Job Changes Following Childbirth

Are Women Trading Compensation for Family-Responsive Work Conditions?

SARAH BETH ESTES

University of Iowa

JENNIFER L. GLASS

University of Iowa

As women increasingly maintain labor force participation following childbirth, job changing rather than labor force withdrawal is on the rise. This article presents a theoretical perspective that takes into account the increasing financial responsibilities of mothers and modifies human capital propositions concerning job changing. We investigate initial differences between women who change jobs following childbirth and those who stay with their prenatal employer, as well as the differences between changers' prenatal and postpartum jobs. Then we use regression analysis of change scores to assess whether women make trade-offs between compensation and family accommodations. Results reveal that women are not making job changes that maximize family accommodations at the expense of monetary compensation. Rather, they suggest that women are motivated by financial and family responsibilities to increase their share of both dimensions, although their improvement on both dimensions is stunted because of their weak market position.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?