Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Work and Occupations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BALDI, S.
Right arrow Articles by McBRIER, D. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Do the Determinants of Promotion Differ for Blacks and Whites?

Evidence from the U.S. Labor Market

STÉPHANE BALDI

Ohio State University

DEBRA BRANCH McBRIER

Ohio State University

A central assumption of much of the previous research on race differences is that the process by which Blacks and Whites advance in the workplace is race blind so that if Blacks and Whites had the same amount of education and job experience and were located across the same bureaucratized structures, the gap in Black-White attainment in the workplace would disappear. The authors argue that to understand the systematic differences in Black-White outcomes in the workplace, we need to reexamine this assumption. The authors develop a theoretical argument for the existence of race-specific models of attainment that builds on Kanter's concept of "homosocial reproduction." They then test this argument by estimating whether the determinants of promotion differ by race, using a nationally representative sample of U.S. workers and their employing organizations. Their findings indicate that the determinants of promotion systematically differ for Blacks and Whites.

Work and Occupations, Vol. 24, No. 4, 478-497 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0730888497024004005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Career DevelopmentHome page
R. S. Shinnar
A Qualitative Examination of Mexican Immigrants' Career Development: Perceived Barriers and Motivators
Journal of Career Development, June 1, 2007; 33(4): 338 - 375.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
J. Shih
Circumventing Discrimination: Gender and Ethnic Strategies in Silicon Valley
Gender Society, April 1, 2006; 20(2): 177 - 206.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Black StudiesHome page
R. Parks-Yancy
The Effects of Social Group Membership and Social Capital Resources on Careers
Journal of Black Studies, March 1, 2006; 36(4): 515 - 545.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
R. A. Smith
Do the Determinants of Promotion Differ for White Men Versus Women and Minorities? An Exploration of Intersectionalism Through Sponsored and Contest Mobility Processes
American Behavioral Scientist, May 1, 2005; 48(9): 1157 - 1181.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work and OccupationsHome page
D. B. McBrier and G. Wilson
Going Down?: Race and Downward Occupational Mobility for White-Collar Workers in the 1990s
Work and Occupations, August 1, 2004; 31(3): 283 - 322.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work and OccupationsHome page
D. J. Maume Jr.
Is the Glass Ceiling a Unique Form of Inequality?: Evidence From a Random-Effects Model of Managerial Attainment
Work and Occupations, May 1, 2004; 31(2): 250 - 274.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work and OccupationsHome page
S. P. Vallas
Rediscovering the Color Line within Work Organizations: The `Knitting of Racial Groups' Revisited
Work and Occupations, November 1, 2003; 30(4): 379 - 400.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work and OccupationsHome page
R. A. Miech, W. Eaton, and K.-Y. Liang
Occupational Stratification Over the Life Course: A Comparison of Occupational Trajectories Across Race and Gender During the 1980s and 1990s
Work and Occupations, November 1, 2003; 30(4): 440 - 473.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
C. D. Zatzick, M. M. Elvira, and L. E. Cohen
When is More Better? The Effects of Racial Composition on Voluntary Turnover
Organization Science, September 1, 2003; 14(5): 483 - 496.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work and OccupationsHome page
R. A. SMITH
Particularism in Control Over Monetary Resources at Work: An Analysis of Racioethnic Differences in the Authority Outcomes of Black, White, and Latino Men
Work and Occupations, November 1, 2001; 28(4): 447 - 468.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work and OccupationsHome page
G. M. McGUIRE
Gender, Race, Ethnicity, and Networks: The Factors Affecting the Status of Employees' Network Members
Work and Occupations, November 1, 2000; 27(4): 500 - 523.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
E. H. James
Race-Related Differences in Promotions and Support: Underlying Effects of Human and Social Capital
Organization Science, September 1, 2000; 11(5): 493 - 508.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work and OccupationsHome page
R. SPALTER-ROTH and C. DEITCH
"I Don't Feel Right Sized; I Feel Out-of-Work Sized": Gender, Race, Ethnicity, and the Unequal Costs of Displacement
Work and Occupations, November 1, 1999; 26(4): 446 - 482.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work and OccupationsHome page
G. WILSON, I. SAKURA-LEMESSY, and J. P. WEST
Reaching the Top: Racial Differences in Mobility Paths to Upper-Tier Occupations
Work and Occupations, May 1, 1999; 26(2): 165 - 186.
[Abstract] [PDF]