Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information Leadership, Fifth Edition

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Work and Occupations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DE COSTER, S.
Right arrow Articles by MUELLER, C. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Routine Activities and Sexual Harassment in the Workplace

STACY DE COSTER

University of Iowa

SARAH BETH ESTES

University of Iowa

CHARLES W. MUELLER

University of Iowa

This article draws from criminological research on victimization and on organizational models of the social context of sexual harassment to propose a routine activities explanation of sexual harassment victimization. The authors propose that certain features of organizations can be used to conceptualize guardianship as well as the proximity component of target suitability in the routine activities framework. The authors also discuss the features of individuals (target attractiveness) that may make them more or less susceptible to victimization, holding organizational features constant. They test hypotheses from a routine activities explanation of sexual harassment using data from a national company in the U.S. telephone industry. The authors find general support for the importance of both organizational features and individual characteristics in the prediction of sexual harassment victimization. However, they find little evidence that individual characteristics and organizational features interact in the production of harassment victimization, which is counter to a routine activities approach.

Work and Occupations, Vol. 26, No. 1, 21-49 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0730888499026001003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
A. M. O'Leary-Kelly, L. Bowes-Sperry, C. A. Bates, and E. R. Lean
Sexual Harassment at Work: A Decade (Plus) of Progress
Journal of Management, June 1, 2009; 35(3): 503 - 536.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work and OccupationsHome page
L. J. Chamberlain, M. Crowley, D. Tope, and R. Hodson
Sexual Harassment in Organizational Context
Work and Occupations, August 1, 2008; 35(3): 262 - 295.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Asia Pacific Journal of Human ResourcesHome page
J. Cogin and A. Fish
Managing sexual harassment more strategically: An analysis of environmental causes
Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, December 1, 2007; 45(3): 333 - 352.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work and OccupationsHome page
C. W. MUELLER, S. DE COSTER, and S. B. ESTES
Sexual Harassment in the Workplace: Unanticipated Consequences of Modern Social Control in Organizations
Work and Occupations, November 1, 2001; 28(4): 411 - 446.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work and OccupationsHome page
G. F. JENSEN and R. HODSON
Synergies in the Study of Crime and the Workplace: An Editorial Introduction
Work and Occupations, February 1, 1999; 26(1): 6 - 20.
[PDF]