This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by GERSTEL, N. Articles by McGONAGLE, K. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Job Leaves and the Limits of the Family and Medical Leave Act

The Effects of Gender, Race, and Family

University of Massachusetts-Amherst

KATHERINE McGONAGLE

University of Michigan

This article examines the need for and use of leaves designated by the Family and Medical Leave Act. Using national data, we show that women, parents, those with little income, and African Americans are particularly likely to perceive a need for job leaves. However, it is married—not single—women and Whites who are particularly likely to take such leaves. The authors suggest that this disjunction between need and use is a consequence of the construction of leave policy—that it provides for only short, unpaid leaves for a narrow slice of workers and those politically constructed as "family"—and the unresponsiveness of workplaces. These limits likely reinforce inequality based on gender, race, and family status.

Work and Occupations, Vol. 26, No. 4, 510-534 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0730888499026004006


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. S. Wharton, S. Chivers, and M. Blair-Loy Use of Formal and Informal Work-Family Policies on the Digital Assembly Line Work and Occupations, August 1, 2008; 35(3): 327 - 350. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. S. Heywood, W. S. Siebert, and X. Wei The implicit wage costs of family friendly work practices Oxf. Econ. Pap., April 1, 2007; 59(2): 275 - 300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. E. Davis and A. L. Kalleberg Family-Friendly Organizations? Work and Family Programs in the 1990s Work and Occupations, May 1, 2006; 33(2): 191 - 223. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. L. Griffin Gender and Stress: A Comparative Assessment of Sources of Stress Among Correctional Officers Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, February 1, 2006; 22(1): 5 - 25. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. L. Hofferth and S. C. Curtin Parental Leave Statutes and Maternal Return to Work After Childbirth in the United States Work and Occupations, February 1, 2006; 33(1): 73 - 105. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Wallace and K. T. Leicht Culture Wars in the Workplace?: Cultural Antecedents of Workers' Job Entitlement Work and Occupations, February 1, 2004; 31(1): 3 - 37. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. W. Budd and A. M. Brey Unions And Family Leave: Early Experience Under The Family And Medical Leave Act Labor Studies Journal, September 1, 2003; 28(3): 85 - 105. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Wysong and D. W. Wright Family Friendly Workplace Benefits: The U.S., Canada, and Europe Crit Sociol, May 1, 2003; 29(3): 337 - 367. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. F. MENNINO and A. BRAYFIELD Job-family Trade-offs: The Multidimensional Effects of Gender Work and Occupations, May 1, 2002; 29(2): 226 - 256. [Abstract] [PDF]