Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Work and Occupations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by EDWARDS, P.
Right arrow Articles by COLLINSON, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Empowerment and Managerial Labor Strategies

Pragmatism Regained

PAUL EDWARDS

University of Warwick, United Kingdom

MARGARET COLLINSON

University of Warwick, United Kingdom

Hopes that senior managers attach to programs of empowerment are often dashed in practice. Yet, little research has been conducted into whether lower level managers embrace the language of empowerment, and if not, how they view efforts to develop employee commitment. Case study research in six named organizations in the United Kingdom reveals that managers did not use the term empowerment and that they distinguished its claims to give substantial freedom to employees from more meaningful concepts such as autonomy and involvement. Empowerment meant little because of the financial and other constraints on autonomy, whereas more specific efforts to improve involvement had clear effects on employee behavior. The language of empowerment is not used to mislead workers and hence theories that see empowerment as an insidious form of labor control are not sustained.

Work and Occupations, Vol. 29, No. 3, 272-299 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0730888402029003002
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Economic and Industrial DemocracyHome page
J. Niemela and S. Kalliola
Team Membership and Experiences of Work in the Finnish Context
Economic and Industrial Democracy, November 1, 2007; 28(4): 552 - 588.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Human RelationsHome page
S. Bach, I. Kessler, and P. Heron
The consequences of assistant roles in the public services: Degradation or empowerment?
Human Relations, September 1, 2007; 60(9): 1267 - 1292.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Human RelationsHome page
N. Llewellyn and A. Harrison
Reply: Politics dressed as plain truth (again): On rhetorics of `openness' and `impartiality' in Christensen et al
Human Relations, April 1, 2007; 60(4): 663 - 672.
[PDF]

Home page
 JIRHome page
P. H. Sawchuk
'Use-Value' and the Re-thinking of Skills, Learning and the Labour Process
Journal of Industrial Relations, November 1, 2006; 48(5): 593 - 617.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Work and OccupationsHome page
R. Hodson, V. J. Roscigno, and S. H. Lopez
Chaos and the Abuse of Power: Workplace Bullying in Organizational and Interactional Context
Work and Occupations, November 1, 2006; 33(4): 382 - 416.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Work and OccupationsHome page
J. Belanger, P. K. Edwards, and M. Wright
Commitment at Work and Independence From Management: A Study of Advanced Teamwork
Work and Occupations, May 1, 2003; 30(2): 234 - 252.
[Abstract] [PDF]