Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Work and Occupations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Stern, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Judgments About Work

Dimensionality Revisited

Monica Kirkpatrick Johnson

Washington State University, monicakj{at}wsu.edu

Jeylan T. Mortimer

University of Minnesota

Jennifer C. Lee

Indiana University

Michael J. Stern

Oklahoma State University

The authors examine the measurement structure of individuals' orientations toward work rewards, or "judgments about work," a concept central to the social psychology of work. Despite extensive and sustained interest in the level of importance attached to work rewards by major markers of social location such as birth cohort, social class origins, and gender, prior studies have not examined whether the same classification schema captures the underlying variation in judgments about work across these axes of social location. Drawing on five data sets, the authors examine the fit of models corresponding to the recently revived entrepreneurial–bureaucratic classification schema with those corresponding to the dominant extrinsic–intrinsic classification schema across subgroups of the population using confirmatory factor analysis. Findings offer only limited support for reconceptualizing judgments about work along entrepreneurial–bureaucratic dimensions but call for additional research on the dimensions of judgments about work that emerge under distinct conditions and across different groups.

Key Words: work preferences • judgments about work • job characteristics • confirmatory factor analysis

Work and Occupations, Vol. 34, No. 3, 290-317 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0730888407303182


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Work and OccupationsHome page
S. Hald Andersen
Unemployment and Subjective Well-Being: A Question of Class?
Work and Occupations, February 1, 2009; 36(1): 3 - 25.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work and OccupationsHome page
S. Sengupta, P. K. Edwards, and C.-J. Tsai
The Good, the Bad, and the Ordinary: Work Identities in "Good" and "Bad" Jobs in the United Kingdom
Work and Occupations, February 1, 2009; 36(1): 26 - 55.
[Abstract] [PDF]