This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0730888407313032v1 35/2/164    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Timmermans, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Professions and Their Work

Do Market Shelters Protect Professional Interests?

University of California-Los Angeles, Stefan{at}soc.ucla.edu

Eliot Freidson introduced the concept of the "market shelter" to designate the unique institutional position that professions hold in society. A market shelter shields professional workers from competition, third party and government interference, and other market forces. Once put in place through legal mandates, however, it remains unclear how market shelters weather with political and economic changes and provide benefits for professionals, the state, and the public. This article reviews how clinical medicine and forensic medicine reacted to outside pressures to address the problem of practice variation to understand under which conditions stable market shelters may be professionally harmful and how less sheltered professions may instead use the fight against external challenges to solidify their professional position.

Key Words: profession theory • change • market shelter • evidence-based medicine

This version was published on May 1, 2008

Work and Occupations, Vol. 35, No. 2, 164-188 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0730888407313032


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?