This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Choi, S. Articles by Tomaskovic-Devey, D. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Contingent Autonomy

Technology, Bureaucracy, and Relative Power in the Labor Process

Jeong Sang Language School

Jeffrey Leiter

North Carolina State University

Donald Tomaskovic-Devey

University of Massachusetts-Amherst

The authors argue that autonomy in the labor process results from the contingent interaction of worker power and organizational practices. Focusing on the "core jobs" (i.e., most central to the production process) in 618 randomly sampled workplaces in Australia, the authors find that the influences of technology and bureaucratization on autonomy are conditioned by the relative power (skill and unionization) of employees. As the relative power of workers increases, both the technical organization of work and bureaucratization are less likely to undermine job autonomy. The findings underline the importance of local power relations for understanding the impact of organizational structures on workers and help resolve deep ambiguities in the literature on autonomy and the labor process.

Key Words: autonomy • bureaucracy • technology • power • status • unions

Work and Occupations, Vol. 35, No. 4, 422-455 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0730888408326766


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?