This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Emerson, R. M. Articles by Pollner, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Policies and Practices of Psychiatric Case Selection

Melvin Pollner

Department of Sociology, University of California, Los Angeles

This paper describes the factors affecting how psychiatric emergency teams (PET teams) evaluate and responded to, legitimated or discounted, the calls of community members. Such calls were processed on two distinct levels-the psychiatric and the practical. PET teams had a variety of policies and procedures for assessing the psychiatric "seriousness" of a case. On many occasions, however, the psychiatric ordering would be subordinated to organizationl and personal factors. The paper concludes with a consideration of structuralfactors which promoted this subordination of psychiatric to pragmatic criteria for selection.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?