|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Work Orientation and Wives' Employment CareersAn Evaluation of Hakim's Preference Theory
Man Yee Kan
University of Oxford, man-yee.kan{at}sociology.ox.ac.uk
This article uses work-life history data from the British Household Panel Survey (1991-2001) to examine married/cohabiting women's work histories and their gender-role attitudes. Findings suggest that women's employment careers are affected by both preferences and constraints. The presence of dependent children poses less of a barrier to full-time work for women with work-centered attitudes than other women. Nevertheless, women having a continuous employment career tend to be childless. Finally, there is a reciprocal relationship between gender-role attitudes and women's labor market participation, suggesting that preferences are changeable according to labor market experience.
Key Words: employment gender-role attitudes preference theory work orientation
References
Bakker, A.B., & Geurts, S.A.E. (2004). Toward a dual-process model of work-home interference. Work and Occupations, 31, 345-366.[Abstract] Becker, G.S. (1991). A treatise on the family (Enlarged ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Burchell, B.J., Dale, A., & Joshi, H. (1997). Part-time work among British women. In H.-P. Blossfeld & C. Hakim (Eds.), Between equalization and marginalization: Women working part-time in Europe and the United States of America (pp. 210-246). New York: Oxford University Press.Callender, C., Millward, N., Lissenburg, S., & Forth, J. (1997). Maternity rights and benefits in Britain 1996. London: The Stationery Office.Cox, D.R., & Wermuth, N. (1993). Linear dependencies represented by chain graphs. Statistical Science, 8, 204-218.[Web of Science]Cox, D.R., & Wermuth, N. (1996). Multivariate dependencies: Models, analysis and interpretation. London: Chapman and Hill.Crompton, R. (1997). Women and work in modern Britain. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Crompton, R., & Harris, F. (1999). Employment, careers, and families: The significance of choice and constraint in women's lives. In R. Crompton (Ed.), Restructuring gender relations and employment: The decline of the male breadwinner (pp. 128-149). New York: Oxford University Press.Evans, G., & Andersen, R. (2004). The political conditioning of economic perception: Evidence from the 1992—97 British electoral cycle. Nuffield College Politics Working Paper (Paper 2004-W9),University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.Finkel, S.E. (1995). Causal analysis with panel data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Gornick, J.C., Meyers, M.K., & Ross, K.E. (1998). Public policies and the employment of mothers: A cross-national study. Social Science Quarterly, 79(1), 35-54.[Web of Science]Hakim, C. (1996). Key issues in women's work: Female heterogeneity and the polarisation of women's employment. London: Athlone.Hakim, C. (1998). Developing a sociology for the twenty-first century: Preference theory. British Journal of Sociology, 49(1), 137-143.[CrossRef][Web of Science]Hakim, C. (2000). Work-lifestyle choices in the 21st century: preference theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Hakim, C. (2002). Lifestyle preference as determinants of women's differentiated labor market careers. Work and Occupations, 29, 428-459.[Abstract/Free Full Text]Heise, D.R. (1970). Causal inference from panel data. Sociological Methodology, 2, 3-27.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]Hofferth, S.L., & Curtin, S.C. (2006). Parental leave statutes and maternal return to work after childbirth in the United States. Work and Occupations, 33, 73-105.[Abstract/Free Full Text]Jarvis, L., Hinds, K., Bryson, C., & Park, A. (2000). Women's social attitudes: 1983 to 1998. A report prepared for the women's unit, Cabinet Office. London: National Centre for Social Research.Kan, M.Y. (2006). Symmetrical relationships? Influences of partners' characteristics on each other's housework participation and political choice. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.Kmec, J.A. (2005). Setting occupational sex segregation in motion: Demand-side explanations of sex traditional employment. Work and Occupations, 32, 322-354.[Abstract]Lorenz, F.O., Conger, R.D., Simons, R.L., & Whitbeck, L.B. (1995). The effects of unequal covariances and reliabilities on contemporaneous inference: The case of hostility and marital happiness. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 1049-1064.[CrossRef][Web of Science]Maume, D.J. (2006). Gender differences in taking vacation time. Work and Occupations, 33, 161-190.[Abstract/Free Full Text]McGovern, P., Smeaton, D., & Hill, S. (2004). Bad jobs in Britain: Non-standard employment and job quality. Work and Occupations, 31, 225-249.[Abstract]McRae, S. (1991). Maternity rights in Britain: The experience of women and employers. London: Policy Studies Institute.McRae, S. (2003). Constraints and choices in mothers' employment careers: A consideration of Hakim's Preference Theory. British Journal of Sociology, 54(3), 317-338.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]Nagel, E. (1961). The structure of science: Problems in the logic of scientific explanation. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.Shingles, R.D. (1985). Causal inference in cross-lagged panel analysis. In H. M. Blalock (Ed.), Causal models in panel and experimental designs. New York: Aldine.Stier, H., Lewin-Epstein, N., & Braun, M. (2001). Welfare regimes, family-supportive policies, and women's employment along the life-course. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1731-1760.[CrossRef]Trappe, H., & Rosenfeld, R.A. (2004). Occupational sex segregation and family formation in the former east and west Germany. Work and Occupations, 31, 155-192.[Abstract]Walby, S. (1997). Gender transformations. London: Routledge.Wheaton, B., Muthen, B., Alwin, D., & Summers, G.F. (1977). Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. Sociological Methodology, 8, 84-136.[CrossRef]
Work and Occupations, Vol. 34, No. 4,
430-462 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0730888407307200

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Yaish and H. Stier
Gender Inequality in Job Authority: A Cross-National Comparison of 26 Countries
Work and Occupations,
November 1, 2009;
36(4):
343 - 366.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Steiber and B. Haas
Ideals or compromises? The attitude-behaviour relationship in mothers' employment
Socioecon. Rev.,
October 1, 2009;
7(4):
639 - 668.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. M. Donato, C. Wakabayashi, S. Hakimzadeh, and A. Armenta
Shifts in the Employment Conditions of Mexican Migrant Men and Women: The Effect of U.S. Immigration Policy
Work and Occupations,
November 1, 2008;
35(4):
462 - 495.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. E. Pixley
Life Course Patterns of Career-Prioritizing Decisions and Occupational Attainment in Dual-Earner Couples
Work and Occupations,
May 1, 2008;
35(2):
127 - 163.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|